The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the pending application.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
CNR No. DLHC010056912026
ABDUL WAHAB .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Tuteja and Ms. Beauty Yadav, Advs., for Petitioner (Through video-conferencing) versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate for MCD. Ms. Snehlata S. Surana, CGSC with Mr. Waseem Ahmad, Advocate for Delhi Police. Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Mr. Rohit Sabharwal, Ms. Sheetal Sharma and Ms. Heena Sharma, Advs., for Respondent No. 7 (Through videoconferencing)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 16.09.2026
AMIT BANSAL, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2026/ at
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:38:53
ABDUL WAHAB
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER & ORS.
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
