Income-tax writ petition dismissed as infructuous on the petitioner's statement that the petition had been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
RITES LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Artatrana Panda & Ms. Gargi Sethee, Advs.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LTU, DELHI NEW DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC with Ms. Easha Gurung, JSC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
DINESH MEHTA, J.
VINOD KUMAR, J.
MARCH 9, 2026/ sr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/03/2026 at 13:42:18
RITES LTD
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LTU, DELHI NEW DELHI
DINESH MEHTA
VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
