Disposed

Renew Dinkar Urja Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Central Transmission Utility of India Limited & Anr.

Delhi HC6 Jan 2026W.P.(C)/19837/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a notice threatening revocation of 200 MW connectivity for a solar power project in Bikaner. The Court directed status quo with no precipitative steps by CTUIL until CERC considers the matter, without expressing any view on merits.

What did the court decide?

Status quo direction: no precipitative action by CTUIL on impugned notice till CERC hears matter

Renew Dinkar Urja Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Central Transmission Utility of India Limited & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~8

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 19837/2025

¶4

RENEW DINKAR URJA PVT LTD & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Buddy Ranganathan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishrov Mukerjee, Mr. Girik Bhalla, Mr. Ameya Vikra Mishra, Mr. Deepak Thakur, Ms. Shefali Tripathi, Ms. Akriti Gandotra & Mr. Kaustubh Kapoor, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

CENTRAL TRANSMISSION UTILITY OF INDIA LIMITED & ANR.

¶7

.....Respondents Through: Ms. Poorva Saigal & Ms. Reeha Singh, Advocates for R-1.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

¶9

O R D E R % 06.01.2026

¶10

The petitioner no.1 in the present petition is setting up a 200 MW Solar Power Project at Tehsil and District Bikaner, Rajasthan .

¶11

The present petition raises a grievance with respect to notice dated 11^th December, 2025 issued by the respondent no.l/ Central Transmission Utility of India Limited (‘CTUIL’), whereby the said respondent has threatened to revoke 200 MW connectivity granted to the petitioner no.l for its Solar Power Project.

¶12

The petition came up for hearing before the Vacation Bench on 31^st December, 2025, on which date it was directed that till the next date of

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/01/2026 at 11:47:20

¶16

hearing before CERC, no precipitative steps shall be taken by the respondent no.1 pursuant to the impugned notice dated 11^th December, 2025.

¶17

It is stated that the interim application filed by the petitioner is listed before the CERC on 8^th January, 2026.

¶18

Accordingly, it is directed that status quo shall be maintained and no precipitative steps or action shall be taken by the respondent no.1 pursuant to the impugned notice dated 11^th December, 2025.

¶19

It is clarified that the present status quo order is being passed for a limited period till the matter is taken up for hearing and considered by CERC.

¶20

It shall be open for CERC to consider whether or not continuation of the aforesaid interim direction is warranted or not, considering the facts and circumstances of the case.

¶21

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the case.

¶22

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of.

¶23

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶24

JANUARY 6, 2026 at

¶25

Page 2 of 2

¶26

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/01/2026 at 11:47:20

Renew Dinkar Urja Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Central Transmission Utility of India Limited & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Renew Dinkar Urja Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Central Transmission Utility of India Limited & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Inspector (Gd) Prabhat Kr. Shahi Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ex-Servicemen Welfare Union Vs Union of India and Ors.

Inspector (Gd) Manoj Kumar Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Inspector (Gd) Dharam Pal Vs Union of India and Ors.

Deputy Commissioner of Police Vs Ex.Const. Arvind Kumar

Samir Krishan Modi Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Umesh Kumar & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Anchal Vs the Union of India through Chief Passport Officer Delhi & Anr.

Sh Jagmohan Bahl Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

Vidya Deep Public School ( through Its Principal Girish Kumar Bansal) Vs Bses Yamuna Power Limited

Prem Bawa & Anr. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

Sh. Rajesh Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Akhilesh Kumar Jain and Ors. Vs Registrar of Societies and Ors.

Salman Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.