The petition was withdrawn by the petitioner as it had become infructuous. The High Court granted liberty to withdraw and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Liberty to withdraw the petition granted; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~99
PRECISION TECHNIK PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sidhartha Sharma, Mr. Arjun Asthana and Ms. Aakanksha Sahni, Advs.
versus
NTPC VIDYUT VYAPAR NIGAM LIMITED & ANR.
.....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R % 15.01.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JANUARY 15, 2026/p/amg
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/01/2026 at 13:35:33
Precision Technik Private Limited
NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Limited
Anr.
Purusahindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
