Disposed
UOI & Anr. v. Manjeet Kaur
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/1952/2007
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A writ petition pending since 2007 was disposed of as the respondent had taken voluntary retirement and no representation was made. Petitioners retain liberty to seek revival if the respondent seeks implementation of the impugned order.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~R3
¶2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 1952/2007 UOI & ANR. .....Petitioners
¶4
Through: Mr. Vikram Jetly, CGSC with Ms. Shreya Jetly, Advocate.
¶5
versus
¶6
MANJEET KAUR .....Respondent
¶7
Through: None.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 25.02.2026
¶10
- This writ petition is pending in this Court for the last 19 years. There is no representation on behalf of the Respondent.
¶11
- The learned counsel representing the Petitioners submits that the Respondent has taken voluntary retirement on 16.12.2016.
¶12
- Keeping in view of the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioners to file application for revival if the Respondent ever prays for implementation of the impugned order.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
UOI
- petitioner
ANR
- respondent
Manjeet Kaur
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court