Writ petition sought to restrain MCD from further demolition of a Chirag Delhi property without due process. MCD noted partial demolition already occurred and the petitioner's proper remedy was the Appellate Tribunal, MCD. Petitioner withdrew, with liberty to approach the ATMCD within fifteen days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
NITIN JAIN .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anuj Kumar Garg, Advocate
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shilpa Dewan, Additional Standing Counsel, MCD
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 11.02.2026
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 1921/2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/02/2026 at 13:35:05
ATMCD within fifteen (15) days from today.
AMIT BANSAL, J
FEBRUARY 11, 2026 ds
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 1921/2026
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/02/2026 at 13:35:05
Nitin Jain
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
