One-line order closing a writ petition after recording an affidavit submission by the DDA, deemed sufficient to dispose of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
CNR No. DLHC010981072025
BALBIR SINGH KADIAN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Petitioner no. 4 (Through videoconferencing )
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
& ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu & Mr. Parvin Bansal, Advocates for DDA. Advocate for Mr. Kapil Dutta, Standing Counsel for MCD (Through video-conferencing )
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 19.08.2026
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 18559/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2026 at 10:43:46
AMIT BANSAL, J
AUGUST 19, 2026
at
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 18559/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2026 at 10:43:46
Balbir Singh Kadian & Ors.
Delhi Development Authority
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
