Writ petition against LIC regarding restoration of insurance agency and payment of renewal commission. Respondent's counsel undertook to restore the agency and pay balance renewal commission within six weeks if a fresh application was filed; petition disposed of with rights left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
RAJEEV KUMAR GARG
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Aayush Agarwala, Mr Vipul Singh, Advocates.
versus
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA
.....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahindru, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 08.04.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
APRIL 8, 2026/AR
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/04/2026 at 12:36:37
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent's undertaking to restore the petitioner's insurance agency and pay balance renewal commission sufficed to resolve the writ petition.
Rajeev Kumar Garg
Life Insurance Corporation of India
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
