Disposed¶20

Mr Raman Malik v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC19 Feb 2026W.P.(C)/17599/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition (W.P.(C) 17599/2025, Delhi High Court, Amit Bansal J., decided 19.02.2026) by Raman Malik against MCD & others seeking building plan sanction for House No. C-100, Anand Niketan (423.20 sq. yds.) without co-owner (respondent no.2) NOC; MCD affidavit: deficiencies conveyed 03.11.2025, plan deemed rejected 03.12.2025; mediation ongoing between petitioner and respondent no.2; petition disposed of with liberty to file fresh sanction application; pending CM APPL. 72703/2025 disposed of; no statutes or cases cited; co-owner NOC question left open.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application for the sanction of the Building Plan; the pending application (CM APPL. 72703/2025) also stands disposed of. ¶20

Mr Raman Malik Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~4

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 17599/2025 & CM APPL. 72703/2025

¶4

MR RAMAN MALIK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Mr. Jay Bharadwaj and Ms. Nikita Tiwari, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Mahajan, Advocate for R-1.

¶7

Mr. Ashish Verma and Mr. Krishna Kant, Advocates for R-2. Ms. Sapna Chauhan and Ms. Bhoomi, Advocates for DDA (through VC) .

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 19.02.2026

¶11

The present writ petition has been filed praying for directions to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), to proceed with the application filed by the petitioner for the sanction of a Building Plan in respect of property bearing House No. C-100, Anand Niketan, New Delhi , measuring 423.20 square yards, without requiring a “no objection certificate” of the coowner, i.e. respondent no. 2.

¶12

Notice was issued in the present writ petition on 19^th January 2025, while directing that if any objections are raised by the respondent no.1/MCD in the application for the sanction of Building Plan, the petitioner may make

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

W.P.(C) 17599/2025

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/02/2026 at 11:51:32

¶17

good those deficiencies.

¶18

In the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no.1/MCD, it is stated that the deficiencies in the Building Plan were communicated to the petitioner’s architect on 3^rd November 2025. However, the same have not been removed in a timely manner. Accordingly, the Building Plan of the subject property has been deemed to be rejected on 3^rd December 2025.

¶19

Counsel for the petitioner submits that mediation proceedings are ongoing between the petitioner and respondent no.2.

¶20

In view thereof, the present writ petition is disposed of while giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh application for the sanction of the Building Plan.

¶21

Pending application also stands disposed of.

¶22

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶23

FEBRUARY 19, 2026

Vivek/-

Page 2 of 2

W.P.(C) 17599/2025

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/02/2026 at 11:51:32

Mr Raman Malik v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Raman Malik v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B.R. Aravindakshan Vs Union of India & Ors.

Master Hemaang Goel Vs Union of India & Ors.

M S Itd Cementation India Limited Vs Rupal Murmu and 22 Ors. & Anr.

Mrs Madhu Chopra Vs Unique Identification Authority of India - Uidai

Vijai Prakash Shukla Vs UOI & Anr.

Sahil David Vs Union of India & Ors.

S Ranjit Singh & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Union of India & Ors. Vs Hav. Jawan Singh (Retd.) (No. 01586159L)

Urvashi Verma Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Sh. Baljeet Singh Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Chintu Jain Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Rajiv Pandey Vs New Delhi Municipal Council

Dinesh Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Yash Jaggarwal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.