Correction order in an income-tax writ petition. The court deleted paragraph 12 of its earlier order dated 06.01.2026 due to a date objection, and corrected a typographical error in paragraph 3, replacing 'SLPs before Hon'ble the Supreme Court' with 'appeal before the Delhi High Court'.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~74
MIXPANEL INC .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney & Mr. Nishank Vashistha, Advocates
versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAX 221 NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Apoorv Agarwal, Mr. Parth Samwal, Jr. SCs, Ms Nupur Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Singh, Mr. Bhanukaran Singh Jodha, Ms Muskaan Goel, Mr. Himanshu Gaur, Mr. Gaurav Kumar Arya and Mr. Nischay Purohit Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR
O R D E R % 19.01.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/01/2026 at 13:25:06
Supreme Court has been inscribed which, as a matter of fact ought to have been appeal before the Delhi High Court.
DINESH MEHTA, J
VINOD KUMAR, J
JANUARY 19, 2026 sk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/01/2026 at 13:25:06
Mixpanel Inc
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle International Tax 221 New Delhi
Dinesh Mehta
Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
