Disposed¶10

Km Vineeta v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Delhi HC9 Feb 2026W.P.(C)/16750/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court, W.P.(C) 16750/2025 & CM APPL. 8323/2026, order dated 09.02.2026 (Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia): Petition of Km. Vineeta disposed of on settlement with Respondent No.9 Airplaza Retail Holdings Private Limited per Settlement Agreement dated 14.01.2026; Respondent No.9 paid Rs. 60,00,000/- via three demand drafts (Rs. 30,00,000/- to Petitioner; Rs. 15,00,000/- each to deceased's father Munshi Lal and mother Urmila Devi); pending applications disposed; no statutory or case-law citations; no impugned order described.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 14.01.2026 executed between the Parties; pending Application(s) also disposed of. ¶10

Km Vineeta Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~47

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16750/2025 & CM APPL. 8323/2026 KM VINEETA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rudra Vikram Singh, Mr. Ashirvad Kumar Yadav, Ms. Neetu Rani, Ms. Rashmi, Mr. Gaurav Tripathi & Mr. Shashank Shukla, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sameer Vashisht & Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Advocates for R-1&2. Mr. Manish Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora & Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Advocates for BSES. Mr. Akhil Mittal, Ms. Shayna Das Pattanayak & Ms. Ridhi Jain, Advocates for R-5 with Mr. Kishore Kumar, SI. Mr. Tushar Sannu & Mr. Pravin Bansal, Advocates for DJB. Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Mr. Ahmed Jamal Siddiqui, Mr. Kshitiz Kishore Rai & Mr. Madhav Tripathi, Advocates for MCD. Mr. Nipun Joshi, Advocate for R-7 to 9.

¶3

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 09.02.2026 1. The Petitioner – Km. Vineeta has joined the proceedings today again through Video Conferencing (“ VC ”) and again affirmed the statement regarding settlement of the present Petition.

¶4

This is a digitally signed order.

¶5

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/02/2026 at 14:01:52

¶6

The learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that he was unable to contact the Petitioner, however, identifies that the woman appearing through VC is the Petitioner – Km. Vineeta.

¶7

The Petitioner has settled the matter with Respondent No.9 – Airplaza Retail Holdings Private Limited and a Settlement Agreement dated 14.01.2026 (“ Settlement Agreement ”) has been executed between the Parties. The Settlement Agreement is on record. The same has been signed by the Petitioner, Mrs. Urmila Devi, mother of the deceased and Mr. Munshi Lal, father of the deceased and the representative of Respondent No.9.

¶8

In terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Respondent No.9 has made payment of ₹60,00,000/- by way of three Demand Drafts. The first of which is for a sum of ₹30,00,000/- drawn in the name of the Petitioner, the second one is for a sum of ₹15,00,000/- drawn in the name of Mr. Munshi Lal, father of the deceased and the third is also for a sum of ₹15,00,000/- drawn in the name of Mrs. Urmila Devi, mother of the deceased. The said Demand Drafts also contained the signatures of the Petitioner, father of the deceased and thumb impression of the mother of the deceased.

¶9

In view of the aforesaid, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present Petition, which stands disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement arrived at and executed between the Parties.

¶10

The Petition as well as the pending Application(s) stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶11

DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ

¶12

TEJAS KARIA, J

¶13

FEBRUARY 9, 2026 ‘gsr’

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/02/2026 at 14:01:52

Km Vineeta v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Km Vineeta v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anuj Vs Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board

Sri Saudan Singh Institute of Higher Education Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Smt Harpyari Devi Girls Degree College Vs National Council for Teacher Education & Anr.

Siddharth Mishra Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Madanjit Kumar Vs Central Electronics Limited

Sh. Sanjeev Rana Vs Bses Yamuna Power Ltd.

Mahesh Nath Singh Vs National Commission for Scheduled Castes & Ors.

Deepak Kaushik Vs Principal Judge North West District and Ors.

Ska Insurance Surveyors and Loss Assessors Private Limited Vs Regional Director Northern Region & Anr.

Nav Gian Deep Public School Vs Central Board of Secondary Education (Cbse) & Anr.

Sachin Vs Union of India & Ors.

M/S Vedanta Limited Vs the Nominated Authority Ministry of Coal Government of India & Ors.

Rajeev Behl Vs Lieutenant Governor State of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.

Jntl Consumer Health India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Anr.