Kamala Mandal v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent even on the last day for hearing and no one appeared on her behalf.
A writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent even on the last day for hearing and no one appeared on her behalf.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
CNR No. DLHC010780712024
Through: None versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ......Respondents Through: Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Adv. for R1 Mr. Vinay Rathi, Adv. for DUSIB
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 11.08.2026
JASMEET SINGH, J
AUGUST 11, 2026/AS
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/08/2026 at 12:29:06
Kamala Mandal
Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court