Income-tax writ petition closed after the respondent Department accepted the petitioner's return of income and assessed his income during pendency, rendering the petition academic; petition and pending applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
SANDEEP GROVER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarang Agarwal & Mr. Abhishek Arora, Advs. along with the petitioner in person.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Snehlata S Surana, CGSC with Mr.Pradyumn Singh, Adv. for UoI Mr. Indruj Singh Rai, SSC with Mr.Sanjeev Menon, Mr. Rahul Singh & Ms. Priya Sarkar, JSCs & Mr.Gaurav Kumar, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN
DINESH MEHTA, J
SHAIL JAIN, J
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/04/2026 at 12:16:46
APRIL 6, 2026/ kk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/04/2026 at 12:16:46
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives when, during its pendency, the Department has accepted the petitioner's return of income and assessed his income.
Sandeep Grover
Union of India
Dinesh Mehta
Shail Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
