Writ petitioner sought withdrawal after surrendering the subject stalls to the respondents; the court recorded the submission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without deciding anything on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
MANJUSHA SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocate
versus
THE CHIEF COMMERCIAL MANAGER/CATERING & ORS. .....Respondents Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R % 20.01.2026
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 20, 2026 ds
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/01/2026 at 12:49:02
Manjusha Singh
The Chief Commercial Manager/Catering
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
