Petitioner sought withdrawal of its petition before the Delhi High Court. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and rendered the pending applications infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~48
M/S MADHAN AND COMPANY .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sudeep Sudan & Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advs.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Kritika Gupta, Adv. for R- 1/DDA Mr. Brijesh Kumar Tamber, Ms. Arani Mukherjee and Mr. Vinay Singh Bist, Advs. for R-3 / Punjab Sind Bank
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 14.05.2026
ANISH DAYAL, J
MAY 14, 2026/s
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2026 at 11:57:09
M/S Madhan and Company
Delhi Development Authority
Punjab Sind Bank
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
