The High Court disposed of the writ petition by consent, directing the respondents to treat the petition as a representation and communicate their decision within 12 weeks, including consideration of the interest component.
Petition treated as representation; decision to be communicated within 12 weeks including interest component.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~62
CNR No. DLHC010438732026 + W.P.(C) 13511/2026 & CM APPL. 63020/2026 EX CT COOK NARAYAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Ajinkya Dhalwade and Mr. Nikhel Kumar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ranjeev Khatana, SPC with Mr. Rohit Kapoor, Ms. Divyanshi Bucha, Mr. Arjav Sethi, Mr. Abhishek Singh, CLA
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA O R D E R
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J
AMIT SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2026/ sky/gs
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:54:42
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's representation regarding service matters should be decided by the respondents within a specified timeframe.
EX CT COOK NARAYAN
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE
AMIT SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
