Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioners failed to appear on three consecutive hearing dates; no submissions were made and no issue was adjudicated on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
.....Petitioners
Through: None.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
.....Respondent Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Standing Counsel with Mr. Bir Inder Singh Gurm, Mr. Aditya Verma, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
O R D E R % 12.02.2026
JASMEET SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2026/sp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/02/2026 at 12:43:02
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution given the petitioners' absence on three consecutive hearing dates.
Manjeet Kaur And Ors.
Delhi Development Authority
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
