Writ petition regarding complaints against property E-112, Shaheen Bagh was withdrawn after respondents noted a mismatch of property numbers and photographs; petitioner sought withdrawal with liberty to act afresh.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take steps in accordance with law; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
Through: Mr. Om Srivastava, Advocate.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocate for R- 1/MCD. Mr. Himanshu Kaushik, Mr. Rupender Sharma and Mr. Aaransh Pathak, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Saifi Ahmad, Advocate for R-3
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
%
05.01.2026
W.P.(C) 13/2026
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 12:19:30
liberty to take steps in accordance with law.
AMIT BANSAL, J
JANUARY 5, 2026
Vivek/-
W.P.(C) 13/2026
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/01/2026 at 12:19:30
RAJA BABU
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
AMIT BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
