Two expeditious writ petitions challenging non-compliance with a recovery certificate were disposed of by the Court. Respondents undertook personal attention to the matter, and the petitions were disposed with no specific relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14 and 15
Through: Ms. Meghna De and Ms. L. Gangmei, Advs.
versus
PROJECT DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manashwy Jha, Panel Counsel for R-1 and 2.
Through: Ms. Meghna De and Ms. L. Gangmei, Advs.
versus
PROJECT DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manashwy Jha, Panel Counsel for R-1 and 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 11.02.2026
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/02/2026 at 13:37:11
SACHIN DATTA, J
FEBRUARY 11, 2026/ cl
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/02/2026 at 13:37:11
SH DHARAM VIR
PROJECT DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT
SACHIN DATTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
