Bhagwan Singh Dabas & Anr. Vs Gnctd & Ors.

¶1

$~73

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 1191/2026, CM APPL. 5854/2026

¶4

BHAGWAN SINGH DABAS & ANR. .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Ashutosh Rana, Advocate. versus GNCTD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC with Mrs. K.K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr. M.S. Akhtar, Advocates for R-3. Mr. Abhinav Singh and Mr. Rishabh Mittal, Advocates for GNCTD. Mr. Manashwy Jha, Panel Counsel for GNCTD.

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶7

O R D E R

¶8

% 28.01.2026 1. The Petitioner is the intending purchaser 1/4th share out of land admeasuring Khasra No. 142//162 (0-09) situated in the revenue estate of Village Khanjawala, Delhi – 110081. A document was executed for the transfer of the said land from the recorded owner in the Petitioner’s favour described as “sale deed” dated 27^th November, 2025 and was duly presented before Respondent No. 2 (Sub-Registrar) for registration. A receipt evidencing such presentation has been issued; however, the document has not been processed further.

¶9

It is the case of the Petitioner that despite repeated follow-ups with Respondent No. 2, the sale deed has neither been registered nor has any formal order of refusal been passed, thereby constraining the Petitioner to

¶10

This is a digitally signed order.

¶11

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 12:56:03

¶12

invoke the writ jurisdiction of this Court.

¶13

Counsel for the Respondents submits that the land in question is under consolidation proceedings and, in the absence of a No Objection Certificate (NOC)/land status report from the competent authority, the registration could not be processed. It is further submitted that the land proposed to be transferred could be under acquisition and the status is required to be verified.

¶14

As regards the requirement of NOC founded on the pendency of consolidation proceedings, this Court in Okaya Infocom Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.¹ has ruled that considering the prolonged nature of consolidation proceedings, registration of a sale deed cannot be indefinitely withheld on the ground of non-availability of an NOC. The Court accordingly directed the Sub-Registrar to proceed with registration in accordance with law, without insisting upon any sanction, approval, or NOC linked to consolidation. The same view was reiterated by this Court by judgment dated 12^th August, 2025 in Jeevantika Organic Farming LLP v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors .,² and other connected matters.³ In the said case, the Court taking note of the stand of the government, provided for an undertaking to be furnished by the intending purchaser.

¶15

In light of the aforenoted decisions, this Court is of the opinion that the present petition can be disposed of by issuing directions in similar terms. 6. Accordingly, the following directions are issued:

¶16

(i) The Petitioner shall file an undertaking by way of an affidavit, stating that the factum of this order shall be disclosed in the event of any further

¶17

1 In W.P.(C) 12122/2021 , decided on 10th November, 2023.

¶18

2 In W .P. (C) 12083/2025 & other connected matters decided on 12th August, 2025.

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 12:56:03

¶21

transaction relating to the subject land, prior to the conclusion of the consolidation proceedings. The undertaking already placed on record is taken on record to this effect is accepted and the Petitioner shall remain bound thereby.

¶22

(ii) Any violation of the aforesaid undertaking shall entail consequences in accordance with law. The said undertaking shall also form part of the registered sale deed, so as to put any subsequent purchaser to notice of the subsisting undertaking.

¶23

(iii) Subject to verification of the land acquisition status, and in line with the decisions in Okaya Infocom Pvt. Ltd. and Jeevantika Organic Farming LLP , it is directed that the registration of the sale deed dated 18^th December, 2025, which is pending with Respondent No. 2, shall not be refused solely on the ground of pendency of consolidation proceedings or non-availability of any NOC in that regard. The same be proceeded further in accordance with law.

¶24

(iv) It is clarified that the registration shall be without prejudice to the pending consolidation proceedings and shall remain subject to the rights, claims, and contentions of third parties, if any.

¶25

With the following directions, the petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any.

¶26

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶27

JANUARY 28, 2026 nk

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/02/2026 at 12:56:03

Bhagwan Singh Dabas & Anr. v. Gnctd & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagwan Singh Dabas & Anr. v. Gnctd & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nikita Jain Vs Union of India & Anr.

Deepan Chaudhary Vs Delhi Jal Board & Anr.

Union of India and Ors. Vs Randhir Kumar and Ors.

Mukesh Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.

Rajan Bhatia Vs Union of India & Ors.

Pravin Sharma Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Ashish Kishor Vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Madangir Cooperative Society through Its President Vs Delhi Development Authority

Jeet Singh Vs Airports Authority of India and Ors.

Umang Jain Vs Reserve Bank of India through the General Manager Human Resource Management Department Department

Subhdra Devi & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi through Its Chief Secretary & Ors.

Sudhanshu Yadav Vs Delhi Development Authority & Anr.

Rahul Dwivedi Vs Vinita Aggarwal & Anr.

Itush Bansal Vs Wefast India Private Limited