Writ petition concerning registration of a sale deed; counsel stated relief had become infructuous as the deed was registered. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
DR. SANJIV CHANDRA THOUGH HIS ATTORNEY AKASH
SHOKEEN .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Abhay Dixit and Ms. Risha Dixit, Advocates.
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE THROUGH ITS STADING COUNSEL & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu and Ms. Palak Gupta Joshi, Advocates for GNCTD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
SANJEEV NARULA, J
JULY 7, 2026/ hc
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/07/2026 at 12:23:29
Dr. Sanjiv Chandra though his attorney Akash Shokeen
Government of NCT of Delhi Department of Revenue
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
