Pramod & Ors. v. DDA & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioners' counsel sought to withdraw the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of the pending application.
What the court decided
$~21
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010283782022
- W.P.(C) 11228/2022 & CM APPL. 32990/2022
PRAMOD & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Advocate. versus DDA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel for DDA with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advocate. Mr. Ashutosh Gupta, ASC for MCD with Mr. Pulkit Garg, Advocate for MCD. Mr. Sanchar Anand, Mr. Aditya Kumar and Mr. Rajat Rathee, Advs., for Respondent No. 17 (Through video-conferencing) Mr. Ujjwal Chaudhary, Adv., for Respondent No. 3/Indian Olympic Association (Through videoconferencing)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
%
O R D E R 16.09.2026
- Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition.
- Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PRAMOD & ORS.
- respondent
DDA & ORS.
Coram
Amit Bansal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court