This order disposed of a writ petition challenging MCD actions. A status report indicated one property housed a pre-2003 Madarsa entitled to protection, while unauthorized construction on another was noted. The petitioner did not appear, and the case was closed without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
MCD AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Kshitiz Kishor Rai & Ms. Anamika, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil) for R-2. Mr. Niraj Kumar, Senior Central Government Counsel for R-4. Mr. Anil Panwar, Mr. Tanishq Panwar, Ms. Arushi Panwar, Mr. Nikhil Goel, Mr. Sahej Sawhney & Mr. Dipit Sareen, Advocates for R-5.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
%
13.07.2026
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(C) 10877/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 12:09:29
Act, 2006.
AMIT BANSAL, J
JULY 13, 2026 at
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 10877/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/07/2026 at 12:09:29
Imran Malik
MCD
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
