Disposed¶17

Mohd. Badruddin v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Delhi HC17 Apr 2026W.P.(C)/10389/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Tehbazari relocation writs disposed: Mohd. Badruddin (W.P.(C) 10389/2025) and Salim Ahmed (W.P.(C) 10391/2025) v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi; sites 3526 and 3499 (7' x 5' covered), Bapu Market, Gandhi Maidan Parking, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006; earlier order 19.11.2025 (three-week allotment assurance); MCD status report 23.08.2025; alternate sites allotted at Meerdard Road, Delhi Gate; no further orders called for; petitions and pending applications disposed 17.04.2026; Bench: Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Madhu Jain; petitioners unrepresented; no statutory or case-law citations.

What did the court decide?

No fresh relief ordered; petitions closed in view of MCD's report that relocation was complete and alternate tehbazari sites had been allotted at Meerdard Road, Delhi Gate; all pending applications also disposed of.

Mohd. Badruddin Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10389/2025 MOHD. BADRUDDIN .....Petitioner Through: None versus

¶2

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Beenashaw N Soni, Standing Counsel, MCD with Ms. Mansi Jain , Ms. Ann Joseph and Ms. Katyani Malhotra, Advs.

¶3

~9 + W.P.(C) 10391/2025 SALIM AHMED .....Petitioner Through: None versus

¶4

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Beenashaw N Soni, Standing Counsel, MCD with Ms. Mansi Jain , Ms. Ann Joseph and Ms. Katyani Malhotra, Advs.

¶5

CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

¶6

O R D E R

¶7

% 17.04.2026

¶8

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶9

None appears for the Petitioners.

¶10

Vide order dated 19th November, 2025, this Court directed as under:

¶11

“Ms. Soni, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 1/MCD, on instructions, states that the file relating to the petitioners has already been processed and that tehbazari sites shall be allotted within a period of three weeks from today.”

¶12

This is a digitally signed order.

¶13

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/04/2026 at 12:08:24

¶14

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (hereinafter, ‘MCD’ ) has filed a status report dated 23rd August, 2025 as per which, the tehbazari sites nos. 3526 and 3499 both size 7' x 5' (covered) previously situated at Bapu Market in front of Gandhi Maidan Parking, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006 were allotted to the Petitioners from where they were removed.

¶15

According to the said status report, the relocation of these two Petitioners has been done. Time of three months’ was sought for relocation in terms of the status report however, Ms. Beenashaw Soni, ld. Counsel appearing for the MCD submits that the alternate sites have been allotted to the Petitioners at Meerdard Road, Delhi Gate.

¶16

In view thereof, no further orders are called for in these two petitions.

¶17

Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of in these terms. All pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.

¶18

PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

¶19

MADHU JAIN, J.

¶20

APRIL 17, 2026 Rahul/ck

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/04/2026 at 12:08:24

Mohd. Badruddin v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Badruddin v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aditi Randhawa Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Rakesh Jolly Vs Idbi Bank

Bishwabhbhar Nath Tiwari Vs Union of India & Ors.

Devender Rai Vs Sangeet Natak Akademi New Delhi

M/S Malik Seasoning and Spices Private Limited Vs Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax

M/S Kanika Exports Vs Union of India & Ors.

Gupta Bros. (India) Vs Lokesh Nanda

M/S Ambika Engineering Works Vs Inderjeet Chaudhary & Anr.

Samma Praveen Vs Chairman, Town Vending Committee and Ors.

Arjun Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Mohd Alam Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Salim Ahmed Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Surender Kumar Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

Ashish Saxena and Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.