Disposed

Rajshree Singh v. Amarendra Dhari Singh

Delhi HC10 Jan 2025TR.P.(CRL.)/1/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Related petitioners sought transfer of multiple cheque dishonour complaints against the same accused to one court. The High Court allowed the petitions, directing that the Saket Courts cases be transferred to Patiala House Court, where all matters will be heard by the same court.

What did the court decide?

Petitions allowed; pending Saket Courts cases transferred to Patiala House Court for joint hearing before one court.

Rajshree Singh Vs Amarendra Dhari Singh — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~50, 51 & 53

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- TR.P.(CRL.) 1/2025, CRL.M.A. 462/2025 & CRL.M.A. 463/2025 RAJSHREE SINGH .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sahiba Singh, Mr. Dhruv Malik, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

AMARENDRA DHARI SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Shakeib Naru, Ms. Oorjasvi Goswami, Advocates + TR.P.(CRL.) 2/2025, CRL.M.A. 478/2025 & CRL.M.A. 479/2025 ADITI SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sahiba Singh, Mr. Dhruv Malik, Advocates

¶7

versus

¶8

AMARENDRA DHARI SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Shakeib Naru, Ms. Oorjasvi Goswami, Advocates

¶9

- TR.P.(CRL.) 4/2025, CRL.M.A. 504/2025 & CRL.M.A. 505/2025 ARUNDHATI KHANNA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sahiba Singh, Mr. Dhruv Malik, Advocates

¶10

This is a digitally signed order.

¶11

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:52:31

¶12

versus

¶13

AMARENDRA DHARI SINGH .....Respondent

¶14

Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Shakeib Naru, Ms. Oorjasvi Goswami, Advocates

¶15

CORAM:

¶16

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

% 10.01.2025

¶19

Through the present petitions filed under Section 447 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Petitioners seek transfer of cases enumerated below:

¶20

S.No.	Cause Title and Court	Date of filing	Present status
	Concerning M	rs. Aditi Sing	h
i	CC No. 2669 of 2022 - Patiala House Courts	04.03.2022	Statement of Accused (Only Partly recorded)
ii.	CC No. 6073 of 2022 - Saket Courts	22.07.2022	Stayed vide order dated 06.09.2023 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Crl. M.C. 6436 of 2023
iii	CC No. 6670 of 2022 - Saket Courts	08.08.2022	Pending consideration of Application under Section 142 (1)(b), NI Act
C	oncerning the Petitioner’s d	aughter i.e. Ar	undhati Khanna

¶21

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:52:31

¶22

i CC No. 2657 of 2022 - Patiala House 04.03.2022	04.03.2022 Statement of Accused yet to commence.
Concerning the Petitioner i.e. Rajsh	ree Singh
i CC No. 2670 of 2022 - Patiala House 04.03.2022	Statement of Accused yet to commence

¶23

Mr. Ravi Prakash, Senior Counsel for the Petitioners, states that the Petitioners in the afore-mentioned transfer petitions are related to each other. He urges that there is a commonality in the facts in the present case as the accused, who is the brother of Ms. Rajshree Singh, is common in all the petitions. He submits that in order to avoid any conflicting views, it would be appropriate in case all the cases are heard and decided by the Saket Court. 3. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Counsel for the Respondent, although opposes the petitions and states that he is not averse in case all the matters are clubbed before one Court. However, he states that the first complaint was filed before the Patiala House Court and therefore, he submits that all cases could be directed to be placed before the same Magistrate as per Section 142(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

¶24

Considering the foregoing, the present petitions are allowed and it is directed that CC No. 6073/2022 and CC No. 6073/2022 pending before the Saket Courts, shall stands transferred to Patiala House Court. All the cases shall be heard by the same Court. 5. The Copy of this order shall be communicated to Principal and District Sessions Judge, Patiala House Court for reference.

¶25

Accordingly, the present petitions, along with pending applications,

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:52:31

¶28

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶29

are disposed of.

¶30

JANUARY 10, 2025/ab

¶31

This is a digitally signed order.

¶32

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:52:31

Rajshree Singh v. Amarendra Dhari Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajshree Singh v. Amarendra Dhari Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ved Prakash Vs Kamal Goel

Sukhpal Singh Vs Amit Gupta

Rohit Singh Mahiyaria Vs Bhanwar Jitendra Singh

M/S Tarc Limited Vs R L Verma and Sons (Huf) & Anr.

State Vs Manjeet Singh Nd Ors.

Mohd. Eilwa Ghonim Shalaby Vs Ankur Aggarwal and Ors.

Ram Kishan Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

State Vs Shankar

Abdul Mannan Vs the State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Ved Prakash Vs Kamal Goel

Om Prakash Singh Vs State of Gnct Delhi & Anr.

Gaytri Devi Vs State NCT of Delhi

Sunita & Ors. Vs Praveen Dahiya

Jose Inacio Cota Vs Union of India