Allowed

Bhilai Auxillary Industries v. M/S Andhra Ferro Alloys Limited & Ors.

Delhi HC24 Jan 2025TR.P.(C.)/25/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Transfer petition under Sections 24 and 151 CPC sought shifting of execution petition EX(COMM.)19/2023 from Commercial Court-02, North West District to Commercial Court, North District, Rohini Courts. The High Court found no prejudice to respondents and transferred the execution case, with liberty to raise all contentions.

What did the court decide?

EX(COMM.)19/2023 transferred from Commercial Court-02, North West District to Commercial Court, North District, Rohini Courts; liberty granted to raise contentions.

Bhilai Auxillary Industries Vs M/S Andhra Ferro… — Execution and Attachment | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~52

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- TR.P.(C.) 25/2024

¶4

BHILAI AUXILLARY INDUSTRIES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Dalal, Mr. Aditya J., Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S ANDHRA FERRO ALLOYS LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Onkar Nath, Mr. Manish Kumar, Advs. for R-1 & 4.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA O R D E R % 24.01.2025

¶9

The present petition has been filed under Section 24 CPC read with Section 151 CPC seeking transfer of EX(COMM.)19/2023 titled “Bhilai Auxillary Industries Vs. Mis Andhra Ferro Alloys Limited” pending adjudication in the Court of Ld. District Judge (Commercial Court)-02, North West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi to the Court of Ld. District Judge (Commercial Court), North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the execution petition may be transferred as the subject matter lies in the North District.

¶11

Learned counsel for the respondent has opposed the present petition on two grounds. Firstly, the impugned award was passed only against the respondent No.1/ company whereas in execution petition Directors have also been made a party and the transfer has been sought on the basis of the

¶12

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/02/2025 at 10:35:30

¶13

address of the Directors. The second objection raised is that in such kind of cases the execution petition can be filed directly at the place where the property is situated.

¶14

I consider that both the objections as being raised by the learned counsel for the respondent are not relevant for the purpose of transfer petition and these are to be heard and decided on merits by the jurisdictional Court.

¶15

This Court does not consider that any prejudice shall be caused to the respondent by transferring the EX(COMM.)19/2023.

¶16

In the circumstance, EX(COMM.)19/2023 is withdrawn from the Court of Ld. District Judge (Commercial Court)-02, North West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi and assigned to Ld. District Judge (Commercial Court), North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi.

¶17

Transferor Court is directed to send the record to the transferee court.

¶18

Copy of this order be sent to Ld. Principal District and Sessions Judge, North West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi and to Ld. Principal District and Sessions Judge, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi for necessary compliance.

¶19

Liberty is granted to the respondent to raise all contentions before the appropriate Court .

¶20

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J

¶21

JANUARY 24, 2025/AR/KR..

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/02/2025 at 10:35:30

Bhilai Auxillary Industries v. M/S Andhra Ferro Alloys Limited & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhilai Auxillary Industries v. M/S Andhra Ferro Alloys Limited & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh Brij Mohan Bansal Vs Smt Yachana Goel

Shaheen Vs Honey Katyal Ceo/Md Investor Clinic Infratech Private Limited & Anr.

Mahaveera Trading Company Vs Pihu Enterprises and Anr.

Nalini Gupta Vs M/S Profectus Capital Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.

Sarina Vs Koshlinder Sharma

Paramjeet Kaur Vs Ranjeet Singh & Anr.

Monika Jain Vs Ankit Jain

Naini Bajaj Vs Rahul Magoo

Lavanya Vs the Principal Kulachi Hansraj Model School and Ors.

Miss Arushi Bashumbu and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ranjeet Gupta Vs the Principal Aadharshila Vidya Peeth Anr.

Sunita Mehta & Anr. Vs Kishore Kumar Verma & Ors.

Shailender Kumar & Ors. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Hansraj Sharma Vs Kesri Chand Jain & Anr.