M/S Dhanoa Tours and Travels v. M/S White Rose Travels
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn after appellant sought permission to withdraw with liberty to pursue other legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
APPL. 13296/2025
M/S DHANOA TOURS AND TRAVELS .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Nawab Singh Jaglan, Mr. Prince Malik, Advs.
versus
M/S WHITE ROSE TRAVELS .....Respondent Through: Dr. Ankit Gupta, Adv. (VC).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take appropriate legal remedy in accordance with law.
Liberty granted.
In view of the submissions made, the present appeal along with pending applications stands dismissed as withdrawn.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
MARCH 5, 2025/AR/KR/vm..
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/03/2025 at 12:25:29
M/S Dhanora Tours and Travels
M/S White Rose Travels
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court