Appellants in two regular first appeals sought leave to withdraw their appeals to file an appropriate application before the learned Single Judge. The Division Bench permitted withdrawal and dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, closing all pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39 & 40
PRAKASH CHANDER .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv.
versus
VINOD KUMARI BHALLA & ORS. & ORS. .....Respondents
Mr. PN Gautam, Mr. Shivam Ujjainwal, Ms. Chaya Singhal, Advs. R-2(a, b and c) Mr. Vaibhav Bhati, Adv. for R- 4 & 5
40
versus
VINOD KUMARI BHALLA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. PN Gautam, Mr. Shivam Ujjainwal, Ms. Chaya Singhal, Advs. R-3(a, b and c) Mr. Vaibhav Bhati, Adv. for R- 4 & 5
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2025 at 13:05:55
O R D E R
%
10.10.2025
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. OCTOBER 10, 2025 jai/db
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2025 at 13:05:55
Prakash Chander
Nisha Vats
Vinod Kumari Bhalla & Ors.
Anil Kshetarpal
Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
