This order grants the appellant five working days to deposit the Process Fee. Failure to do so will result in the application being deemed dismissed without further judicial reference.
Appellant granted five working days to deposit Process Fee; failure will result in deemed dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
versus
MR. RAM PRATAP GOYAL .....RESPONDENT
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 29.01.2026
CM APPL. 74232/2025 [ by appellant for refund of Court Fees ] in RFA(COMM) 487/2024 (disposed of case)
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
JANUARY 29, 2026 “SK”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:36:58
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant application will be deemed dismissed for non-prosecution if Process Fee is not deposited within the stipulated time.
M/s APL Apollo Tubes Limited
Mr. Ram Pratap Goyal
Anil Kshetarpal
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A first appeal against a decree of a Commercial Court under the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
