Vijay Kumar Sachdeva v. Manoj Madan
Case brief
What is this about?
Vijay Kumar Sachdeva vs Manoj Madan; RFA(COMM) 266/2024; Delhi High Court; order dated 06.02.2025; bench Rekha Palli J. and Saurabh Banerjee J.; appeal disposed of as not pressed; appellant's counsel Arti Bansal and Shruti Goel; respondent's counsel Manish Gandhi; pending application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC before Trial Court unaffected; accompanying applications CM APPL. 39689/2024 (Stay), CM APPL. 39690/2024 (Addl. Docs.), CM APPL. 39692/2024 (Delay 1542 days) also disposed; no merits adjudication, no precedents cited, no monetary relief.
What did the court decide?
The appeal, along with all accompanying applications, is disposed of as not pressed; the dismissal of the appeal will have no bearing on the appellant's pending application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC, which the learned Trial Court will decide on its own merits. ¶15