Dismissed¶20

Liyakat Ali and Ors. v. Sayra Bharti and Ors.

Delhi HC15 Jan 2025RFA/925/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RFA 925/2024; Liyakat Ali and Ors v Sayra Bharti and Ors; Delhi High Court order dated 30.01.2025 by Girish Kathpalia J; recall of order dated 15.01.2025 refused; appeal earlier dismissed as withdrawn at counsel's request; plea of imperfect communication by counsel rejected; allowing recall applications would set up a wrong precedent; withdrawal of only stay application makes no sense; exemption application allowed subject to just exceptions.

What did the court decide?

CM APPL. 5764/2025 (exemption) allowed, subject to all just exceptions; CM APPL. 5763/2025 (recall of order dated 15.01.2025) dismissed. ¶20

Liyakat Ali and Ors. Vs Sayra Bharti and Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~73

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RFA 925/2024

¶4

LIYAKAT ALI AND ORS .....Appellants

¶5

Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

SAYRA BHARTI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: None.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 30.01.2025

¶12

[Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

¶13

CM APPL. 5764/2025 (exemption)

¶14

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶15

CM APPL. 5763/2025 (for recall of order dated 1501.2025)

¶16

On 15.01.2025 which was the first effective date, learned counsel for appellants on instructions of his clients sought permission to withdraw this appeal. The appeal assailed preliminary judgment and decree of partition. At request of counsel for appellants, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Now the appellants have filed this application seeking recall of order dated 15.01.2025, pleading that on 15.01.2025, the counsel wanted to withdraw only the application but “somehow due to imperfect communication, the applicant failed to communicate the reality to this Hon’ble Court” .

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2025 at 12:28:33

¶19

It is nobody’s case that the counsel for the appellants committed any misconduct. Admittedly, the order dated 15.01.2025 was passed in the open court in presence of learned counsel for appellants. Allowing such applications would set up a wrong precedent. Besides, it would be make no sense that the appellants would want to withdraw only the stay application in view of nature of the proceedings.

¶20

Accordingly, the application is dismissed.

¶21

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J

¶22

JANUARY 30, 2025/ry

¶23

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2025 at 12:28:33

Liyakat Ali and Ors. v. Sayra Bharti and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Liyakat Ali and Ors. v. Sayra Bharti and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Haripal @Harpal Singh Vs Smt. Veena Anand

Smt. Geeta & Ors. Vs Rajkiya Sarvodaya Kanya Vidyalaya and Anr.

Anand Kumar Sharma, Since Deceased through His Lrs & Ors. Vs Harish Kumar Sharma

M/S Pal Sons Vs Babu Ram

M/S Royal Security Services Vs Jaipal Singh and Ors.

Kanta Vs Bina Sung