Appeal against decree for possession of tenanted property. Appellant sought withdrawal, undertaking to vacate and hand over vacant possession by 10.07.2025; respondent agreed not to press execution till then. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with decree's operation stayed till that date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~83
FIROZ KHAN THR. SPA .....Appellant
Through: Mr. Ankit Attree, Advocate versus M/S BHATIA INVESTMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Parveen Uppal, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA O R D E R % 10.03.2025 [ Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
CM APPL. 14352/2025 (exemption)
RFA 236/2025 & CM APPL. 14351/2025 (stay)
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2025 at 12:07:38
Presence :
Mr. Ankit Attree, Advocate for appellant Mr. Parveen Uppal, Advocate for respondent
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
MARCH 10, 2025/ rk/tp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2025 at 12:07:38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against a decree for possession of tenanted property should be allowed to be withdrawn with a stay of execution till 10.07.2025.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Firoz Khan thr. SPA
M/S Bhatia Investment
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
