Disposed

Raj Kumar v. Geeta Mittal and Ors.

Delhi HC14 Jan 2025RC.REV./91/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision petition against eviction/execution where respondents had already recovered possession of the premises in execution. Petitioners, relying on prior Delhi High Court judgments and protection under Section 19(1), Delhi Rent Control Act, sought disposal; petition disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of in terms of prior judgments; pending applications closed.

Raj Kumar Vs Geeta Mittal and Ors. — Execution and Attachment | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~58

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RC.REV. 91/2024, CM APPL. 19760/2024, CM APPL. 19761/2024, CM APPL. 19762/2024 RAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: None.

¶5

versus

¶6

GEETA MITTAL AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Saini, Adv. R-1&2 CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 14.01.2025

¶10

This Court had on 08.01.2025 recorded the submissions of the learned Counsel for the Respondents that the Respondents have recovered the possession of the subject premises in accordance with law through execution proceedings.

¶11

1.1 It was contended that since, the possession of the subject premises has been restored, the present Petition has become infructuous. Reliance in this regard was placed by the leaned Counsel for the Respondents upon the judgment passed by this Court in Ashok Gupta v. Deepak Rao¹ , which has relied upon the Judgments of the Supreme Court in NC Daga v. Inder Mohan Singh Rana² and Vinod Kumar Verma v. Manmohan Verma³ . This Court is supported in its view by judgments passed by Coordinate Benches

¶12

1 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7148

¶13

2 (2003) 1 SCC 453

¶14

3 Civil Appeal Nos. 5220-5221 of 2008 dated 19.08.2008

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:32:17

¶17

of this Court including Om Prakash Ashok Kumar & Sons v. Ajay Khurana⁴ , Neelam Sharma v. Ekant Rekhan⁵ , and Bhawani Shankar v Nand Lal and Ors.⁶

¶18

In addition, it is contended that the Petitioners are adequately protected in terms of Section 19(1) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

¶19

Learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, submits that the matter can be disposed of in terms of the aforegoing judgments. Accordingly, the Petition is disposed of. All pending Applications also stand closed.

¶20

The parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

¶21

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

¶22

JANUARY 14, 2025/jn Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶23

4 2024 SCC OnLine Del 5228

¶24

5 2019 SCC Online Del 6487

¶25

6 2021 SCC OnLine Del 4284

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:32:17

Raj Kumar v. Geeta Mittal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kumar v. Geeta Mittal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sameer Seth Vs Vinita Jain and Anr.

Nafis-Ul-Arfin Vs Union of India and Anr.

Pushpa Malik Vs Atul Kumar

Satya Prakash & Sons & Anr. Vs M/S Narain Kumar & Sons (Huf)

S. Vaikundarajan Vs Union of India and Anr.

Qayyum Ali and Anr. Vs Shahida Khatoon and Ors.