Parties settled their inter se disputes in a Delhi High Court revision petition; the settlement application under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC was allowed and the petition was disposed of, with all pending applications closed.
Petition disposed of on settlement between the parties; pending applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
Through: Mr.Siddharth Aggarwal and Mr.Gaurav Sinomanani, Advocates
versus
SHRI DINESH SETHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr.Rajesh Bhatia, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
% 07.02.2025
CM APPL. No. 7552/2025 (UNDER ORDER XXIII RULE 3 CPC)
RC.REV. 79/2021, CM APPL.14873/2021 [For stay] , CM APPL.64516/2023 [For modification of order]
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
FEBRUARY 7, 2025/SV/jn
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:45:51
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Sanjay Nagpal
Shri Dinesh Sethi
Another
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
