Neither party appeared on multiple hearing dates in two revision petitions; the court concluded the petitioners were not interested in pursuing the matters and dismissed both petitions in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18 & 19
% 11.08.2025
No one is present on behalf of either of the parties when the matter is called-out.
The record shows that neither of the parties was present; nor had the petitioners been represented on the last 04 dates i.e. 25.07.2024, 14.11.2024, 02.04.2025 and 13.05.2025.
In view of the above, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing these matters.
The petitions are accordingly dismissed in default and for nonprosecution.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
AUGUST 11, 2025/ ak
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/08/2025 at 12:09:38
Neeraj Gupta
Sanjay Gupta
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
