Mohd Yusuf v. Taj Mohd & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
RC.REV. 492/2018; Mohd Yusuf v. Taj Mohd & Anr.; High Court of Delhi; Justice Saurabh Banerjee; order dated 15.12.2025; rent revision petition; vacant and peaceful possession handed over to landlords; order dated 06.10.2025; petition infructuous, nothing surviving; relied on N.C. Daga vs. Inder Mohan Singh Rana 2003(1) SCC 453 and Vinod Kumar Verma vs. Manmohan Verma & Anr. (C.A. Nos.5220-5221 of 2008, order dated 19.08.2008); petition disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Considering that the vacant and peaceful possession of the subject premises has already been handed over to the respondents/landlords as recorded in the order dated 06.10.2025, and in view of the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in N.C. Daga vs. Inder Mohan Singh Rana (2003(1) SCC 453) and Vinod Kumar Verma vs. Manmohan Verma & Anr., the present petition has become infructuous as there is nothing surviving therein.