Dismissed
Ravi Kapoor v. Rukmani Devi
Delhi HCRC.REV./486/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Revision petition dismissed in default and for non-prosecution as neither party appeared on the date of hearing or on the previous listing. The order decides nothing of general application.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~17
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 486/2018, CM APPLs. 42122/2018, 29721/2019
¶4
- RAVI KAPOOR .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: None.
¶6
versus
¶7
RUKMANI DEVI .....Respondent
¶8
Through: None. CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
¶10
- O R D E R
¶11
- % 15.01.2025
¶12
- There is no appearance on behalf of the parties.
¶13
- There was no appearance on behalf of the parties on the last date of hearing i.e., 10.09.2024, as well.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Ravi Kapoor
- respondent
Rukmani Devi
Coram
AI extract
Tara Vitasta Ganju
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court