Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Laiq Ahmed Vs Nafisa & Ors. — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

Home
Delhi HC
2025
Laiq Ahmed Vs Nafisa & Ors.Laiq Ahmed v. Nafisa & Ors.

Dismissed¶¶12

Laiq Ahmed v. Nafisa & Ors.

Delhi HC10 Feb 2025RC.REV./327/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RC.REV. 327/2024 | Laiq Ahmed (petitioner) versus Nafisa & Ors. (respondents) | High Court of Delhi | Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju | order dated 10.02.2025 | petition dismissed as withdrawn | liberty to withdraw granted | possession of subject premises handed over to Respondents during execution proceedings | no counsel for Respondents | digitally signed order.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the Petitioner to withdraw the present Petition; Petition dismissed as withdrawn. ¶¶12

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Liberty granted to the Petitioner to withdraw the present Petition; Petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Delhi, RC.REV. 327/2024 (Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju, 10.02.2025): Counsel for petitioner Laiq Ahmed submitted that possession of the subject premises had already been handed over to the Respondents (Nafisa & Ors.) during the execution proceedings. Counsel sought and was granted liberty to withdraw the Petition; the Petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Parties to act on the digitally signed copy of the order. No statutes or precedents cited; Respondents unrepresented ('Through: None').

A

$~45

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

- RC.REV. 327/2024

LAIQ AHMED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Daniyal Ayyubi and Mr. Akbar Kaleem, Advs.

versus

NAFISA & ORS. .....Respondents

Through: None.

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

O R D E R

% 10.02.2025

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the possession of the subject premises has been handed over to the Respondents during the execution proceedings. He seeks and is granted liberty to withdraw the present Petition.

Accordingly, the Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

The parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

FEBRUARY 10, 2025/r

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/02/2025 at 12:23:02

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Prior proceeding
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that possession of the subject premises had been handed over to the Respondents during the execution proceedings.¶¶11

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Laiq Ahmed¶¶4
Daniyal Ayyubi, Akbar Kaleem
respondent
Nafisa & Ors.¶¶6

Coram

AI extract

Tara Vitasta Ganjuauthor¶¶8

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Delhi HC
Decided on: 10 Feb 2025 · February
Registered: 12 Nov 2024
Case no.: RC.REV./327/2024
CNR: DLHC010791232024
Bench: Tara Vitasta Ganju
Case type: RC.REV.

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Tara Vitasta Ganju

New Airways Travels Pvt. Ltd. Vs S.K. Gupta & Anr.
7 Feb 2025
Mohd Tahir Aslam Qadri Vs Saeeda Begum
7 Feb 2025
Ashwani Kumar (Since Deceased) through Lrs Vs Hemant Kaushik
7 Feb 2025
M/S R.K. Sharma and Bros through Successor in Interest Smt Mithilesh Sharma Vs Mrs Raj Kumari Moondhra
10 Feb 2025
Jyoti Vs Ravi Gupta
10 Feb 2025
Surinder Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.
10 Feb 2025Writ Petition (Civil)

Cite this judgement

Laiq Ahmed v. Nafisa & Ors., RC.REV./327/2024 (DEL), decided on 10 February 2025.

The High Court of Delhi publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history1

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that possession of the subject premises had been handed over to the Respondents during the execution proceedings.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Tara Vitasta Ganju

Parties & counsel