Landlord's revision petitions for eviction on bona fide requirement were withdrawn, the need having been satisfied; the petitions and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
Petitions dismissed as withdrawn at petitioner's request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5 and 6
M/S PRABHDIT ASSOCIATES PVT LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mohit Batra and Mr. Saket Gakhar, Advs. alongwith AR of petitioner Mr. Prem Kumar Verma
versus
BHARAT KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Ms. Ishita Nagpal, Adv.
6 RC.REV. 272/2018, CM APPL. 24155/2018-For taking on record the revision petition after removing objections
M/S PRABHDIT ASSOCIATES PVT LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mohit Batra and Mr. Saket Gakhar, Advs. alongwith AR of petitioner Mr. Prem Kumar Verma
versus
M/S DHULL AUTOMOBILES/M/S ONALL AUTOMOBILES
.....Respondent
Through: Ms. Ishita Nagpal, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/08/2025 at 13:43:33
petition(s), since its need for bona fide requirement has been satisfied and the petitioner does not wish to pursue the matters any further.
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
AUGUST 14, 2025/Ab
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/08/2025 at 13:43:33
M/S Prabhdit Associates Pvt Ltd
Bharat Kumar
M/S Dhull Automobiles/M/S Onall Automobiles
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
