Revision petition dismissed as petitioners remained in arrears of user and occupation charges and failed to comply with earlier court orders. Respondents left free to seek vacation of premises and recovery of rent and arrears in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
versus
MOHAMMAD NADEEM & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. K. C. Mittal, Mr. Himal Akhtar, Mr. Yugansh Mittal, Mohd. Javed and Ms. Rehana, Advs. for respondents.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 20.08.2025
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
AUGUST 20, 2025/ bh
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/08/2025 at 12:23:43
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition should be entertained given the petitioners' continued arrears of user and occupation charges and non-compliance with prior orders.
Shamshul Islam
Mohammad Nadeem
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
