Dismissed
Krishna v. Akshma Devi
Delhi HCRC.REV./110/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Rent control revision concerning possession of premises. Possession had already been restored to the landlord in December 2018 and the petitioner was absent and uninterested in proceeding. The court dismissed the revision petition.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~26
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- RC.REV. 110/2019 & CM Appl.6455/2020
¶4
- KRISHNA .....Petitioner
¶5
- Through: None. versus
¶6
AKSHMA DEVI .....Respondent
¶7
Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Adv.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
¶10
- O R D E R
¶11
- % 10.01.2025 1. None appears for the Petitioner today. There was no presence on the last date of hearing as well.
¶12
- Learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent had informed the Court on the last date of hearing that possession of the subject premises has already been restored to the Respondent/landlord on 19.12.2018.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Krishna
- respondent
Akshma Devi
Coram
AI extract
Tara Vitasta Ganju
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court