Disposed

Dineshchandra R Agrawal Infracon Pvt. Ltd. v. Pawan Hans Limited (Formerly Pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd.)

Delhi HC1 Sept 2025OMP (ENF.) (COMM.)/12/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Execution petition regarding a shortfall of about ₹70 lakhs in the amount deposited by the judgment debtor. Since the quantum was pending in the judgment debtor's Section 34 arbitration petition, the execution petition was disposed of with liberty to revive it after that petition is decided; the decree holder's bank guarantee is to be kept alive meanwhile.

What the court decided

AI extract

Dineshchandra R Agrawal Infracon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pawan… — Execution and Attachment | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 12/2022

¶4

DINESHCHANDRA R AGRAWAL INFRACON PVT. LTD. .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. M.K. Ghosh & Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

PAWAN HANS LIMITED (FORMERLY PAWAN HANS HELICOPTERS LTD.) .....Judgement Debtor

¶7

Through: Mr. Puneet Taneja, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anil Kumar, Mr. Amit Yadav & Mr. Manmohan Singh Narula, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R

¶9

% 01.09.2025

¶10

Vide order dated 6^th March, 2024, the decree holder was granted permission to withdraw the amount deposited by the judgment debtor subject to filing of a bank guarantee.

¶11

Counsel appearing on behalf of the decree holder submits that the amount deposited by the judgment debtor has been withdrawn after furnishing a bank guarantee.

¶12

Counsel for the decree holder submits that there is a shortfall of about ₹70 Lakhs in the amount deposited by the judgment debtor.

¶13

This contention is disputed by counsel for the judgment debtor.

¶14

Be that as it may, since the determination of the aforesaid amount is

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 12/2022

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/09/2025 at 14:50:42

¶19

pending before the Court in OMP(COMM) 472/2019, the petition filed by the judgment debtor under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, there is no necessity to keep the present petition pending.

¶20

The same is disposed of with liberty to the decree holder to revive the same after OMP(COMM) 472/2019 is decided by the Court.

¶21

The Bank Guarantee filed on behalf of the decree holder shall be kept alive during the pendency of Section 34 petition, i.e., OMP(COMM) 472/2019.

¶22

AMIT BANSAL, J

¶23

SEPTEMBER 1, 2025

¶24

¶25

Page 2 of 2

¶26

OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 12/2022

¶27

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/09/2025 at 14:50:42

Dineshchandra R Agrawal Infracon Pvt. Ltd. v. Pawan Hans Limited (Formerly Pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd.)

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Dineshchandra R Agrawal Infracon Pvt. Ltd. v. Pawan Hans Limited (Formerly Pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd.)

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Charat Enterprises & Ors. Vs Knitcraft Apparels Int. P Ltd. and Anr.

Naresh Kumar & Ors. Vs Pawan Kumar & Anr.

M/S Orchid Container Line Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S.Well-Trans & Ors.

Il and Fs Engineering and Construction Company Limited Vs Gail (India) Limited

Sharda Food Specialities Vs Smt. Shakuntala Educational and Welfare Society & Ors.

Schneider International Holding Gmbh & Ors. Vs Pavan Gaur & Ors.