Allowed

Sanjum Chadha v. Okamura Homes Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC13 Aug 2025O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/627/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order extending the mandate of a sole arbitrator from 13.08.2025 to 08.10.2025 under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, regularizing the interim period with the consent of the parties.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the arbitrator extended upto 08.10.2025; period between 19.07.2025 to 12.08.2025 regularised; petition disposed of.

Sanjum Chadha Vs Okamura Homes Pvt. Ltd. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~77

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 627/2025

¶4

SANJUM CHADHA .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Davender Kumar and Ms. Nimisha, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

OKAMURA HOMES PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Manmeet Kaur, Mr. Gurtejpal Singh and Mr. Shantanu Dwivedi, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 13.08.2025

¶12

I.A. 19650/2025

¶13

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

Application stands disposed of.

¶15

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 627/2025

¶16

This petition is preferred on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘1996 Act’) seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitrator.

¶17

Disputes having arisen between the parties with respect to Work Order dated 26.11.2018, Petitioner filed a petition in this Court under Section 11(6) of 1996 Act, being ARB. P. 1052/2022, which was allowed on 07.10.2022 and a Sole Arbitrator was appointed to adjudicate the disputes. Mandate of the learned Arbitrator was extended from time to time and lastly

¶18

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 627/2025

¶19

Page 1 of 2

¶20

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:29:51

¶21

upto 18.07.2025 vide order dated 20.01.2025 in OMP (MISC) (COMM) 53/2025. It is stated that award has been reserved for pronouncement and publication and learned Arbitrator has requested for extension of the mandate till 08.10.2025 vide order dated 12.07.2025.

¶22

Issue notice.

¶23

Ms. Manmeet Kaur, learned counsel for the Respondent accepts notice and on instructions, submits that the Respondent has no objection to the extension of mandate of the learned Arbitrator.

¶24

Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, mandate of the learned Arbitrator is extended upto 08.10.2025 from 13.08.2025 and the period between 19.07.2025 to 12.08.2025 is regularised.

¶25

Petition is allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶26

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶27

AUGUST 13, 2025/shivam

¶28

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 627/2025

¶29

Page 2 of 2

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:29:51

Sanjum Chadha v. Okamura Homes Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjum Chadha v. Okamura Homes Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sps Construction India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Steel Authority of India Ltd. through Its Managing Director & Anr.

M/S Solapur Yedeshi Tollway Ltd. Vs National Highways Authority of India

Kcc Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Rajesh Gupta Vs Oyo Hotels and Homes Pvt. Ltd.

Johnson Controls Hitachi Air Conditioning India Ltd. Vs Mahamaya Infrastructure Private Ltd.

M/S Wave Geo-Services Private Limited Vs M/S Devi Engineering and Constructions Private Limited

G. R Infra Project Limited Vs National Highways Authority of India

M/S Man Bhawan Garments Pvt. Ltd. Vs Ankit Khilwani

Mohammad Amir Vs Axis E Corp Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Bakhtawar Ahmad Rather Vs Airport Authority of India

Kalpataru Projects International Limited Vs Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Moneywise Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Amarnath Electricals Pvt. Ltd. through Its Directors and Ors.

Eci Engineering and Construction Co. Ltd. Vs National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

M/S Kayo Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.