Anupam Bajaj v. Vijay Kumar Sharma
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 29A(4) & (5) Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 mandate extension three months; award reserved after arguments concluded; sufficient cause shown; period from 13.03.2025 regularized; petitioner Anupam Bajaj, respondent Vijay Kumar Sharma; counsel Arvind Kumar (petr.), Himanshu Bodwal (respd.); High Court of Delhi; Justice Jasmeet Singh; order dated 20.03.2025; exemption application I.A. 7157/2025 disposed.
What did the court decide?
The petition under Section 29A(4) & (5) was allowed: the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal was extended by 3 months from 20.03.2025, and the intervening period from 13.03.2025 till the date of the order was regularized. The petition was thereafter disposed of. ¶¶22