Petition under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking extension of the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate, with arguments concluded and award reserved. The respondent raised no objection; the court extended the mandate till 31.07.2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
MECAMIDI HPP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITE .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ankur Goel & Mr. Saket Singh, Advs
versus
BIHAR STATE HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LIMITED .....Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
I.A. 6894/2025 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 237/2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/03/2025 at 17:45:57
concluded their arguments and award has been reserved. The Petitioner has, therefore, approached this Court seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitrator so that the learned Arbitrator can pronounce the award.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MARCH 18, 2025 Rahul
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/03/2025 at 17:45:57
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended so that the reserved arbitral award can be pronounced.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MECAMIDI HPP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
BIHAR STATE HYDROELECTRIC POWER CORPORATION LIMITED
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
