Allowed¶17

Navjit Singh Sandhu (Huf) v. Splendor Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi HC11 Mar 2025O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/221/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi HC; O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 221/2025; Manoj Kumar Ohri J.; 11.03.2025; Navjit Singh Sandhu (HUF) v. Splendor Buildwell Pvt Ltd & Anr; Section 29A A&C Act; extension of arbitral tribunal mandate; six months; mandate expired 05.11.2024; proceedings after expiry validated and regularised; no objection by respondent.

What did the court decide?

Mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal extended by six months with effect from 05.11.2024 for passing of the award; proceedings conducted after expiry of the mandate (from 05.11.2024 till date) validated and regularised; petition disposed of in above terms. ¶17

Navjit Singh Sandhu (Huf) Vs Splendor Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~63

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 221/2025

¶4

NAVJIT SINGH SANDHU (HUF) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddhant Asthana and Mr. Siddhartha Negi, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

SPLENDOR BUILDWELL PVT LTD & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sarthak Gupta, Advocate

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R % 11.03.2025

¶9

I.A. 6478/2025 (exemption)

¶10

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

The application stands disposed of.

¶12

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 221/2025

¶13

By way of the present petition filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (‘A&C Act’), the petitioner seeks extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by a period of six months for concluding the Arbitral proceedings and passing the Award.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal has expired on 05.11.2024.

¶15

Issue notice.

¶16

Learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice and submits that the respondent has no objection to the prayer made in the petition.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid request and the no objection given by the other side, the present petition is allowed and the mandate of the Arbitral

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/03/2025 at 11:45:41

¶20

Tribunal is extended by a period of six months with effect from 05.11.2024, for passing of the award. Further, the proceedings conducted after the expiry of the mandate, i.e., from 05.11.2024 till date is validated and regularised. 6. The present petition is disposed of in above terms.

¶21

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶22

MARCH 11, 2025/ rd

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/03/2025 at 11:45:41

Navjit Singh Sandhu (Huf) v. Splendor Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Navjit Singh Sandhu (Huf) v. Splendor Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Gulati & Ors. Vs Deepak Gulati & Anr.

Metro Transit Pvt. Ltd. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi

Antony Road Transport Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi

M/S Dewan Chand Vs Union of India

Jaibir Singh Vs Delhi Development Authority & Anr.

Universal Agency Ramgarh Pvt. Ltd. Vs Prl Projects and Infrastructure Ltd.

Haldiram Snacks Pvt. Ltd. Vs National Insurance Company Ltd.

Goverdhan Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs Government of NCT of Delhi

M/S Shiv and Sons Vs Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation

Garuda Maverick Infrastructure Projects Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sammaan Capital Ltd.

Profin Capital Services Limited Vs Nivaya Resources Private Limited

Sh. Lovlesh Jain Vs Sunrays Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Moneywise Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Hindstone Industries through Its Proprietor Sh Rishabh Bansal

Kmb-Era Jv Vs Airport Authority of India