Petition under Section 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking extension of the arbitrator's mandate in disputes with Delhi Transport Corporation. The court relied on Rohan Builders to extend the mandate till 31.12.2025 and regularized the lapsed period.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51
EBIXCASH MOBILITY SOFTWARE INDIA LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Ms. Muskan Gupta, Advs.
versus
DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rikky Gupta, Standing Counsel DTC and Ms. Ananya Singh, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 06.03.2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2025 at 12:07:03
Order dated 05.04.2024 extended the mandate of the Arbitrator for a period of one year, i.e., till 28.02.2025. It is stated that the matter is now at the stage of Respondent’s evidence.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MARCH 06, 2025 hsk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2025 at 12:07:03
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the arbitrator, which expired on 28.02.2025, should be extended to conclude the pending arbitration proceedings.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Rohan Builders (India) Private Limited v. Berger Paints India LimitedFollowed¶6
2024 SCC OnLine SC 2494 · Who else cites this
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Ebixcash Mobility Software India Limited
Delhi Transport Corporation
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
