Petitioner sought withdrawal of an arbitration-related miscellaneous petition without prejudice to its contentions in a related commercial arbitration petition. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn, granting liberty as prayed for in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
BAJAJ FINANCE LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Senior Advocate with Ms. Ila Kapoor, Ms. Surbhi Lal and Mr. Rachit Bansal, Advocates.
versus
RAGHVENDRA SINGHANIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Mr. Nikhil Palli, Ms. Vasundhara Bakhru and Ms. Niyati Razdan, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
JYOTI SINGH, J
APRIL 22, 2025/shivam
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/04/2025 at 11:04:44
Bajaj Finance Limited
Raghvendra Singhania & Ors.
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
