Delhi High Court allowed a petition for extension of time for completion of arbitration proceedings by the Sole Arbitrator for six months, noting the petitioner's previous delay but prioritizing the facilitation of proceedings.
Arbitration proceedings extended for six months from the date of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
Through: Mr. Aman Preet Singh Rahi and Mr. Puneet Thakur, Advs.
versus
BLUE COAST INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PVT. LTD. ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naman Joshi, Advocate; Ms. Apoorva Neral, Advocate; Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 11.02.2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/02/2025 at 12:09:21
time.
ANISH DAYAL, J
FEBRUARY 11, 2025/MK/tk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/02/2025 at 12:09:21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether time should be extended for completion of arbitration proceedings before the Sole Arbitrator given the delay by the petitioner.
Rishi Malhotra
Blue Coast Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd.
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
