Petition under Section 29-A seeking extension of the arbitral mandate; award reserved. Unopposed by respondent. Mandate extended four months, interim period regularized, petition disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
M/S SHIVALAY ENTERPRISES THROUGH SOLE PROPRIETOR PRASHANT SHARMA .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Kanika Singh and Mr. Aridaman Raghuvanshi, Advocates.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH
DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST .....Respondent Through: Ms. Avni Singh and Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 19.12.2025
AMIT BANSAL, J
DECEMBER 19, 2025/ Vivek/-
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/12/2025 at 14:38:27
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal should be extended under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Shivalay Enterprises through sole proprietor Prashant Sharma
Govt of NCT of Delhi through Deputy Conservator of Forest
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
